And you became the bearer of the absolute truth when? You may be right. Then again, you may be wrong. I've seen reports saying he was drunk. I've seen one's that said he was sober. Since none of those reports mention someone giving him a breathalyzer at the time of the event, who freakin' knows. Now, if you read korean, you may have one up on me when it comes to access to information, but my point is the same. Assertions by random people on the internet is not proof. I'm a little wary of damning somebody on their merit or on the merit of the evidence that was apparently not enough for a conviction. Am I doubtful? Yah. I didn't just fall off a turnip truck. But jumping on the condemnation bandwagon as some people have put it "to be on the safe side" also goes completely against my idea of what's just. None of us were there. None of us know anything firsthand. All the information we have heard has gone through many of the filters I listed above. So where do any of us get off thinking we have a monopoly on certainty?

@anniemo there's is video footage of her being so drunk she had to be carried, she looked like she passed out, he was fine. In fact Chris here states that he said he was sober because otherwise he was drunk driving.

You want to be just, how about being just for the girl? You want to give him the benefit of the doubt, means you are condemning the girl, blaming her without evidences. In these cases, I tend to side with the victims just because of the stigma associated with being a rape survivor, and the stats says less than 2% of reported rape cases are false.

Whoa whoa whoa. Back the truck up. In what universe does not condemning him mean automatically blaming her? Where do you get off making that accusation? "If you're not with me, you're against me"? Way to be rational. I totally believe you now. On the contrary, I am very purposefully not taking a side because I don't know the truth. Everything you say (aside from your caricature of me) may very well be the truth. Then again, it might not. You are an anonymous individual on the internet (so by the way is "Chris"). I am not naive enough to take your word as gospel, but I am also not calling you or the possible victim a liar. My entire argument is that these are very serious accusations. Whole lives are at stake on both sides. I'm not about to come down on EITHER side based on the conflicting accounts I've heard, hearsay, or rumors. Yes, as an actor, I liked him. That does not give him carte blanche. I will always doubt him (which by the way is because part of me believes her). If you choose to 100% believe her, that is absolutely positively your prerogative. But it is a belief, not a fact. Do not treat it as such and attack other as if it was so.

I would say the same, by the way, to anyone who 100% believed him.

And I'd love to know where you got your rape stat from. Aside from the clear blue sky. NOBODY can know the exact percentage of rape accusations that are false. Absolutely proving something wasn't rape is at least as hard as proving it absolutely was. Also, I'm pretty sure most investigations work towards proving something DID happen. If that can't be done, they don't usually work on proving it DIDN'T happen. You might have convinced me if the stat was something more like "less than 2% of accusations were investigated thoroughly enough to be proven absolutely false." Rape is a horrible crime. It is under reported. The victims often face terrible obstacles and unwarranted blame if they chose to press charges (or even if they don't). But don't make stuff up.